Author: Leon Harris

  • The Cross

    Few symbols in human history carry as much meaning as the cross.

    Today it appears on church steeples, necklaces, paintings, gravesites, and in quiet corners of prayer. I even have one as a vinyl decal on the rear window of my truck. But the cross wasn’t always a religious symbol or a fashion choice. It was originally an execution device.

    The cross was an instrument of humiliation and death used by the Roman Empire to make examples of the condemned. Designed to prolong suffering as publicly as possible, it represented shame, agony, and final defeat in the first-century world.

    And yet Christians adopted it as their central symbol.

    That alone should make us stop for a moment.

    Over time, Christians have expressed this symbol in different ways. Some display an empty cross. Others use a crucifix—a cross bearing the image of Jesus on it. For some, one feels deeply meaningful while the other feels uncomfortable, even unsettling.

    Instead of seeing these differences as conflict, maybe we can look at them as different parts of the same story. And that story can’t be understood without remembering what happened both before and after.

    The Gospel moves through a sequence: Jesus was crucified, died, was taken down and entombed. On the third day, he rose again. That progression matters.

    Christian faith doesn’t center on an ongoing sacrifice, but on a completed one. Jesus’ last words from the cross are as clear as they come:

    “It is finished.”
    (John 19:30)

    The New Testament makes this clear: Christ’s sacrifice was once for all. Hebrews describes Him as having completed His work and then “sat down at the right hand of God”—a picture of something finished, not something continuing. (Hebrews 10:12–14)

    For many Christians, this is why the empty cross holds such power. It quietly proclaims that Jesus is no longer there. Death happened, but death didn’t win. The cross stands as evidence of a finished work—a place where sacrifice occurred, not where Christ remains. The empty cross points toward resurrection.

    Yet other Christians intentionally preserve the image of Jesus on the cross. To someone unfamiliar with the tradition, this can seem like a focus on suffering rather than resurrection. But that’s not the goal.

    The crucifix exists as a reminder of cost.

    Christian faith teaches that redemption was not abstract or symbolic. It happened in a real moment, in real history, through real suffering. The crucifix draws attention to the depth of sacrificial love. It shows that God experienced human pain fully rather than avoiding it.

    Where the empty cross emphasizes victory, the crucifix emphasizes love demonstrated through sacrifice. Neither denies the resurrection. Each simply chooses a different place to rest the eye. One says, “Remember what He endured.” The other says, “Remember that He overcame.” Both belong to the same Gospel.

    If we want to understand why both views exist, we need to remember how shocking the cross was to early Christians.

    In the ancient world, crucifixion represented divine curse and social disgrace. Roman citizens were rarely subjected to it; it was reserved for rebels, slaves, and the powerless. The idea that salvation would come through crucifixion seemed absurd. The apostle Paul acknowledged this directly:

    “…we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles…”
    (1 Corinthians 1:23)

    Early Christians did something extraordinary. They took the empire’s symbol of terror and turned it into a symbol of hope. Through their faith, God transformed what the cross represented. The cross became meaningful not because of the wood, nails, or violence, but because of what God did through it.

    That’s why the symbol carries tension. It holds both sorrow and victory at the same time.

    Seen this way, the difference between an empty cross and a crucifix isn’t a disagreement about salvation. It’s a difference in emphasis. The empty cross reveals that the sacrifice is complete, that Christ is risen, that death has been defeated. The crucifix reminds us that love bore a real cost, that sin was taken seriously, that redemption required sacrifice. One looks primarily toward resurrection. The other lingers at the moment where redemption happened. Together, they tell the full story.

    Some believers feel uneasy when they see the cross used in a frivolous way. They might find it trendy or tacky, but maybe they really just want to preserve the symbolism with Christ. Others feel uneasy when the cross is used as a physical object as if the cross might itself become the focus.

    Historically, Christian teaching distinguished between worship directed to God and visual reminders meant to help us remember. Images, when used, are intended as reminders of events and truths, not objects with power in themselves.

    Ultimately, how we relate to the cross is between us and God. What others do with it doesn’t have to define what it means to us.

    Still, conscience matters. Some connect more deeply through visual reminders of Christ’s suffering. Others find their faith strengthened by focusing on the risen and reigning Christ. When both lead us to fix our eyes on Jesus, we don’t need to turn those differences into divisions. Scripture allows room for differences of conscience among believers who are sincerely trying to honor God. What matters most isn’t uniformity of symbolism, but unity in the person and work of Christ.

    So here’s a question worth sitting with: if Christianity celebrates resurrection, why keep the cross at all? Why not replace it with symbols of victory? Well, some of us do. I’ve started using an anchor that reminds me of how God holds me steadfast through all the storms of life. But I would never replace the cross entirely because of what the cross reveals about God.

    The resurrection shows God’s power. The cross shows God’s character.

    At the cross, we believe God stepped into human suffering rather than standing at a distance. The worst humanity could inflict became the place where forgiveness was offered. The cross reminds us that redemption wasn’t achieved through force or conquest, but through self-giving love.

    Remove the cross entirely, and resurrection risks becoming triumph without context. Keep only the cross, and the story risks ending in tragedy.

    When Christians look at the cross, whether empty or bearing Christ’s image, they’re looking toward the same reality: a moment where death was confronted and transformed. Not a symbol of ongoing defeat, but of finished redemption.

    In the end, the diversity of Christian symbolism may be less about disagreement and more about perception.

    Some believers stand at the foot of the cross, remembering the cost of love. Others stand before the empty tomb, celebrating victory over death. Both are looking at the same Savior.

    And when our differences are merely a matter of perspective, and the message remains the same, it would serve us well to hold those differences with humility. Not every variation is a threat. Sometimes it’s just another angle on the same truth.

    Maybe the cross continues to endure as Christianity’s central symbol because it refuses to let us forget either reality: that salvation was costly, and that death did not have the final word.

  • Hand It Over

    One phrase I’ve heard repeatedly throughout my life was, “Hand it over to God.”

    To which my mind would respond, “Okay… how?”

    It’s not as if I can forward my bills to God. Though I wouldn’t mind.

    There is, of course, the profound truth of Christ taking our sin on the cross. That is certainly one way we “hand it over.” But that’s not what people usually mean when they say it in the middle of everyday frustration.

    More often, “hand it over” is what someone tells you when you’re venting. You’re overwhelmed. You’re angry. You’re hurt. And the response comes quickly: “Just give it to God.”

    The implication is that peace should follow immediately. As if there’s a spiritual switch you flip and the tension evaporates.

    If only it were that simple.

    For years, I thought handing something over to God meant asking Him to fix it. “Lord, take this burden from me.” Which translated into: change them, fix this, resolve that, make me feel better. My prayers became a to-do list for God.

    I wasn’t surrendering. I was managing.

    And I misunderstood something fundamental. Handing it over was never about dictating an outcome. It was about releasing control.


    When It Became Real

    There came a time when this idea stopped being theoretical.

    Someone close to me hurt me emotionally. It wasn’t a single moment. It was a pattern. A cycle. And when I realized the ripple effect was beginning to wound other people I loved, I knew something had to change.

    The problem was I didn’t know what that change should look like.

    What I did know was this: I was miserable.

    It was affecting my thoughts, my mood, my work. I found myself replaying conversations in my head. Imagining future confrontations. Venting to safe people, yes, but still dwelling on negative emotion. It was eating at me.

    Looking back, I can see something else clearly. There was a small fracture forming in my character. I was justifying bitterness because I felt wronged. I was rehearsing frustration. I didn’t label it as sin at the time. But it was. Not because I was hurt, but because I was allowing that hurt to fester.

    When my eyes were opened to that reality, the next step became clear.

    It was time to step back.

    That decision wasn’t dramatic. It was painful. It felt like failure. It felt like loss. But it was necessary. The cycle had to stop, even if I didn’t fully understand what that would mean long term.


    The Guilt That Wasn’t

    Following through helped. But it didn’t bring instant relief.

    Instead, I was haunted by questions.

    Had I really done all I could?
    Was I overreacting?
    Was I making too big a deal out of this?

    I labeled the feeling as guilt. I assumed I was doing something wrong by creating distance. So I beat myself up over it. Over and over.

    In prayer, something shifted. Slowly, I began to understand that what I was feeling wasn’t guilt.

    It was grief.

    I wasn’t mourning a decision. I was mourning a relationship. More accurately, I was mourning the relationship I wished I had. The version that never quite existed the way it should have.

    Understanding that mattered.

    When I understood I was grieving, not failing, the weight lightened. But the thoughts were still there. They branched into other relationships. Old wounds. Old fears. Every step forward felt like two steps back.

    I was exhausted.


    “Come to Me”

    That’s when I was reminded of Matthew 11:28–30. Jesus invites the weary and burdened to come to Him and take His yoke upon them. A yoke implies partnership. Shared load. Direction guided by someone stronger.

    It certainly felt like too much for me to carry alone.

    My first instinct was to think, “Okay. Give it to God.”

    Then I laughed.

    Because what did that even mean?

    For once, instead of dismissing the phrase, I decided I was going to find out.


    The Box

    Let me say something important here. How you hand something over to God depends on you, the specific circumstance, and your relationship with Him. There is no formula. No universal script. No spiritual technique that works the same way for everyone.

    Surrender is personal.

    In my situation, I decided if I didn’t understand it spiritually, then I would at least engage with it practically. I chose to take the phrase literally.

    In prayer, I imagined taking all of it. The hurt. The frustration. The confusion. The grief. I pictured packing it into a box. Every memory, every argument, every what-if.

    Then I imagined physically handing that box to God.

    My prayer was simple.

    “Lord, this box is too heavy for me. I can’t carry it on my own. Please, let me give it to You.”

    Afterward, I felt lighter. Not healed. Not finished. But lighter.

    The next day, the emotions came roaring back.

    My mind was racing. My chest felt tight. The thoughts were louder than before. And then it hit me.

    I had taken the box back.

    Without realizing it, I had picked it up again and started rummaging through it.

    So I tried again.

    In prayer, I packed everything back up. Closed the lid. Handed it back.

    “Lord, I’m sorry. I don’t know why I took this back. I know it’s too heavy for me. Here. This is Yours.”

    And then I did it again the next day.

    And the next.


    What Changed

    Over time, something profound happened.

    The problem didn’t magically disappear. The relationship didn’t instantly repair. The past didn’t rewrite itself.

    But my grip loosened.

    The rehearsing stopped. The obsessive thinking slowed. The emotional charge dulled. I wasn’t pretending it didn’t hurt. I just wasn’t carrying it alone anymore.

    That’s when I understood what “hand it over” truly meant.

    It meant surrendering the right to manage the outcome.

    It meant acknowledging that I could set boundaries without controlling hearts.

    It meant trusting that God could work in ways I couldn’t see.

    And it meant accepting that some grief doesn’t resolve cleanly. Some losses are real. Even when they’re necessary.


    What Scripture Actually Promises

    Jesus never promised that coming to Him would eliminate hardship. He promised rest for the soul.

    There is a difference.

    Casting your anxieties on Him doesn’t mean they vanish. It means you stop pretending you were built to carry them indefinitely. Trusting with your whole heart doesn’t mean you understand everything. It means you acknowledge that your understanding is limited.

    Being yoked with Christ means He sets the pace. He bears the strain. You walk with Him in obedience. Step by step.

    That is not weakness.

    That is freedom.


    A Practical Word

    If you’re holding something heavy right now, here is what I learned.

    Be specific.
    Name the weight.
    Acknowledge your limits.
    And if you have to imagine a box, imagine the box.

    Then hand it over.

    And when you realize you’ve taken it back, don’t spiral into shame. Just give it back again.

    Surrender is rarely a one-time act. It’s often a daily discipline.

    Sometimes a moment-by-moment one.


    Closing Thoughts

    I used to roll my eyes when people said, “Hand it over to God.” Now I understand they weren’t offering a cliché. They were offering an invitation.

    An invitation to stop trying to rule over what you were never meant to control.

    The burden may still exist.

    But when you finally release it, you discover something steady beneath you.

    God doesn’t always remove the box.

    But He is strong enough to carry it.

    And you were never meant to.

  • The Bible

    The Bible has been described in a hundred well-meaning ways.

    It’s a love story. A war story. A story about a Father and His children. A moral guidebook. A record of human history.

    None of those descriptions are wrong. They’re just incomplete.

    The problem isn’t that we say too much about what the Bible contains. It’s that we often miss what the Bible is actually about. When we misunderstand that, everything downstream gets distorted—how we read Scripture, how we talk about faith, how we understand God, and how we understand ourselves.

    The Bible absolutely contains stories of love. It tells of conflict, both physical and spiritual. It reveals a God who calls His people children. But it isn’t a loose collection of inspiring themes. It’s a unified narrative with a center of gravity.

    And that center isn’t humanity.

    The primary story of the Bible is the story of Jesus. It describes who He is, why He came, and what He accomplishes for us. Everything else in Scripture points toward Him, prepares the way for Him, or explains the meaning of His life, death, and resurrection.

    When we start anywhere else, we end up reading the Bible sideways. Read that way, we often see only a barrier—a thicket of rules and history that keeps us at a distance. But when we reorient ourselves and read it rightside up, toward Jesus, we see an open door.

    It helps to say plainly what the Bible isn’t, because a lot of confusion starts there.

    The Bible isn’t primarily a self-help book. It doesn’t exist to teach us how to be better people, manage our emotions, or live more productive lives. Following the wisdom of the Bible will naturally guide us there over time, but self-improvement is a byproduct, not the point.

    It’s not primarily a rulebook. The commandments matter, but they’re not the solution. In fact, one of the Bible’s most consistent messages is that rules alone only reveal what’s broken in us. The Law can’t fix us.

    It’s not primarily a history textbook. The Bible includes real history, but it doesn’t attempt to record every event, culture, or civilization. It’s selective on purpose.

    And it’s not primarily about what humanity can achieve. That assumption quietly sneaks in when the Bible is reduced to moral lessons or inspirational examples. Read that way, Scripture becomes a measuring stick—one we’ll always fail to reach. Or worse, one we begin to think we can reach on our own.

    What the Bible is actually about is God acting on behalf of humanity.

    From beginning to end, it bears witness to a single truth: left to ourselves, we don’t, and can’t, meet God’s standard. Not because the standard is unfair, but because we’re flawed.

    This is the secondary story running throughout Scripture: human failure. We see it immediately. Creation is declared good, and humanity breaks trust almost as soon as it’s given. From there, the pattern repeats endlessly. Promises are made and then broken. Rescue is offered, gratitude fades, and rebellion returns.

    The Bible doesn’t flatter us. It tells the truth about who we are when we’re honest and who we become when we’re not. In this way, Scripture becomes a home for the person who’s run out of ways to fix themselves.

    But human failure isn’t the point of the story. It’s the context that makes the point necessary. The Law doesn’t exist to save humanity. It exists to show us that something is wrong and that we can’t fix it ourselves. It reveals a gap between us and God.

    That gap is where Jesus stands.

    Jesus doesn’t appear late in the story as a backup plan. He’s the fulfillment of what the story has been pointing toward all along. The prophets anticipate Him. The sacrifices foreshadow Him. The Law exposes the need for Him.

    Jesus doesn’t come to help us try harder. He comes because trying harder was never going to be enough. He comes to break the cycle of humanity’s inevitable failure.

    To say that humanity is flawed isn’t to diminish human value. It’s to acknowledge our limits and to make room for something we actually need. Not endless instruction, but relationship. Not constant correction, but guidance. Not abandonment, but a Father who steps in with boundaries, nurture, and love.

    This is where many of us misread the Bible. We read it as a long list of examples to imitate and warnings to avoid, and then wonder why it feels crushing or contradictory.

    The Bible doesn’t say, “Here is how to climb your way back to God.” It says, “You can’t. So God comes to you.”

    That’s the Gospel. It’s not merely advice, instruction, or self-improvement. It’s about rescue.

    When we demand that the Bible be something it was never meant to be, we either reject it unfairly or misuse it dangerously. Some dismiss it because it doesn’t answer every possible question. Others force it to speak on matters it never intended to address. Both miss the point.

    The Bible tells us what we need to know to understand who God is, who we are, and why Jesus matters. It doesn’t tell us everything we might want to know. It tells us what we need to know. The truths we discover outside of Scripture are real and important—science, history, art, discovery, and the human experience all matter. They simply serve different purposes than Scripture.

    The Bible isn’t diminished by its focus. It’s powerful because of it.

    How we read the Bible shapes everything we receive from it.

    When it’s read as a book about self-improvement, it produces shame. When it’s read as a rulebook, it produces pride or despair. When it’s read as a weapon, it produces harm.

    But when it’s read as a witness to Jesus, it produces humility, clarity, and hope.

    Suddenly the Bible stops asking, “Are you good enough?” And starts answering, “You were never meant to be on your own.” It stops sounding like a list of demands shouted from a distance and begins to sound like an invitation offered up close.

    The Bible doesn’t hide humanity’s flaws. It doesn’t exaggerate human potential. It doesn’t minimize the cost of redemption.

    It tells the truth plainly:

    We fail. Repeatedly.
    God does not. Faithfully.

    And in Jesus, God does what we can’t. He restores what was broken, reconciles what was lost, and offers salvation not as a reward for performance, but as a gift of grace.

    That’s the story.

    Everything else in Scripture exists to serve it.

  • Jesus and the Rejected

    There are people who assume, for a variety of reasons, that Jesus couldn’t possibly be reaching out to them.

    They don’t always say it out loud. More often, it shows up as distance. As hesitation. As a quiet dismissal before the question ever fully forms. Faith might work for other people—just not for someone with their history. They’ve made too many mistakes. They live with too many contradictions. There’s been too much damage done, or too much damage received.

    So they stand near the edge. They’re convinced that if God is real, He is, at best, tolerating them from afar.

    What’s striking is how rarely that belief comes from actually reading the Gospels themselves.

    When you slow down and pay attention to who Jesus Christ moves toward—who He notices, speaks with, eats with, touches, and defends—the picture that emerges is almost the opposite of what many people expect.

    Jesus didn’t orbit the acceptable and occasionally glance toward the rejected. He walked straight into their lives.


    Who We Assume Jesus Is For

    Many of us believe an unspoken hierarchy about who God welcomes:

    The faithful.
    The consistent.
    The morally improving.
    The people who “try harder.”
    The ones who don’t embarrass Him.

    By contrast, the rejected—the socially awkward, the morally complicated, the visibly broken—are often treated as projects at best or warnings at worst. That message may not be spoken directly, but it’s felt.

    Come back when you’re cleaner.
    Stay quiet until you’ve figured yourself out.
    Belonging comes after improvement.

    Over time, this settles into a quiet conclusion in the hearts of many: “Jesus might be good. Just not for someone like me.”

    That conclusion doesn’t hold up when you actually follow Jesus through the pages of Scripture. What often feels like spiritual clarity turns out to be something we’ve learned to assume without ever stopping to see if it’s true.


    Who Jesus Actually Welcomed

    One of the clearest patterns in the Gospels is this:
    Jesus consistently moved toward the very people others moved away from.

    • The Woman at the Well

    In John 4, Jesus speaks with a Samaritan woman who carried multiple layers of rejection.

    She was a Samaritan, part of a group despised by Jews.
    She was a woman, approached publicly by a rabbi.
    She had a complicated personal history that made her an object of gossip and shame.
    Even her timing—drawing water alone at midday—suggests someone accustomed to avoidance.

    Jesus does not begin by correcting her life.
    He does not lecture her about repentance.
    He does not require her to explain herself.

    He asks her for water.
    He stays.
    He listens.
    He reveals Himself to her plainly.

    Before her behavior changes, before her understanding is complete, she is treated as someone worth engaging—someone seen.

    Belonging comes first.

    • Tax Collectors and “Sinners”

    Jesus’ reputation among religious leaders was not that He was strict, but that He was reckless with the wrong people.

    “He eats with tax collectors and sinners.”

    The accusation was meant to discredit Him. Instead, it reveals His priorities.

    Tax collectors were collaborators.
    Traitors.
    Financial abusers.

    “Sinners” was a broad label for anyone who didn’t fit religious respectability.

    Jesus did not wait for them to clean themselves up before inviting them to the table.

    He ate with them.
    He shared space with them.
    He restored their dignity in public.

    And only then did lives begin to change—not because shame was applied, but because relationship was offered.

    • Lepers and the Unclean

    Leprosy was not just a medical condition. It was social exile.

    Those labeled “unclean” were physically isolated, ritually avoided, and publicly marked as unsafe. They were accustomed to shouting warnings so others could keep their distance.

    Jesus did not shout back.
    He touched them.

    In a world where no one would make physical contact, Jesus crossed that line deliberately. Healing was not just physical—it was relational. He restored people to community, not just health.

    He did not heal from afar to preserve appearances.
    He drew near, even when it cost Him socially.

    • The Thief on the Cross

    Near the end of His life, Jesus is executed—hung on a cross between two criminals.

    One mocks Him.
    The other—broken, condemned, out of time—asks to be remembered.

    There is no opportunity for restitution.
    No chance for long-term obedience.
    No way to clean up his life.

    When the thief recognizes Jesus and speaks with humility, Jesus does not hesitate.

    “Today you will be with Me.”

    In that moment, religious systems could offer nothing. Tortured and dying, Jesus still gives what He has always given.

    Presence.

    Rejection is not the final word.

    • Peter After Denial

    Perhaps one of the most personal moments comes after the resurrection, when Jesus meets Peter the Apostle—the disciple who denied Him publicly, repeatedly, and at the worst possible moment.

    Peter had once declared unwavering loyalty.
    He had promised devotion without limit.

    But when fear took hold, Peter shunned Him—denying he even knew Jesus.

    Jesus does not open with accusation.
    He asks a question:

    “Do you love Me?”

    He asked the question three times. He did so not to shame Peter, but to restore him.

    Peter did not seek Jesus.
    Jesus sought him.

    Peter’s failure did not disqualify him from the relationship.
    It became the very place where restoration began.


    Jesus Was Rejected, Too

    This pattern is not accidental.

    Jesus does not merely care about rejection.
    He understands it from the inside.

    He was misunderstood by His family.
    Opposed by religious leaders.
    Abandoned by friends.
    Publicly humiliated.

    Even His own hometown sought to kill Him.

    Jesus knows what it is like to be unwanted.


    Executed as a Criminal

    Isaiah describes Him as “despised and rejected by men.”

    Jesus was not rejected because He broke Roman law.
    He was not cast out for criminal behavior or public disorder.

    He was rejected because He unsettled power.
    Because He refused to fit the categories people relied on.
    Because His presence exposed hearts, systems, and hierarchies that preferred to remain untouched.

    Jesus knows what it is like to be unwanted—not for wrongdoing, but for being who He was.

    Which means when He moves toward the rejected, He is not offering distant sympathy.
    He is offering shared ground.

    He stands with those who feel pushed out—because He has stood there Himself.


    Belonging Before Improvement

    This is the distinction many people miss.

    Jesus never pretended that behavior didn’t matter. Yet, He consistently treated belonging as the starting point, not the reward.

    People were welcomed as they were.
    Identity was restored before behavior was addressed.
    Love was extended without preconditions.

    That order matters.

    Because shame rarely produces transformation. But being seen often does.

    The Gospel stories are not about Jesus lowering standards. They are about Him refusing to withhold Himself from those who came to Him—even before they knew how to change.


    For Those Standing at the Edge

    If you’ve ever felt disqualified by your past, your inconsistency, your doubts, or your failures, this matters. If church culture taught you that God tolerates you at best, this matters. If you’ve assumed that Jesus is mostly disappointed in you, this matters.

    The consistent witness of Scripture isn’t that Jesus waited for people to become worthy.

    It is that He treated them as worthy enough to approach in the first place.


    Rejection Is Not the End of the Story

    Jesus does not minimize pain.
    He does not romanticize brokenness.
    He does not ignore harm.

    But He also does not abandon people where they are. He meets them there.

    The heart of the Gospel is not a demand shouted from a distance. It is an invitation offered up close.

    Jesus was rejected so that rejection would never be the final word.

  • Dirty Feet

    There was water in the basin.
    There were towels folded nearby.
    And there were twelve men eating with dirty feet.

    Few moments in the Gospels are as quietly unsettling as the night Jesus washed His disciples’ feet.

    It’s a scene so familiar that it risks becoming tame. This act is often reduced to a symbol of kindness or humility, reenacted ceremonially without much discomfort. But in its original setting, this moment was neither gentle nor sentimental. It was shocking. Awkward. Deeply unsettling to everyone in the room.

    To understand why, let’s begin where the disciples were that night:

    Eating with dirty feet—and no one willing to kneel.


    Feet, Roads, and Rank

    In the first-century Mediterranean world, foot washing was not symbolic. It was both functional and deeply social.

    People walked everywhere. Roads were unpaved, dusty, and often mixed with animal waste. Open sandals were the norm. By the time someone entered a home, their feet were filthy.

    In that world, foot washing wasn’t just a customary form of hospitality or hygienic necessity. It was also hierarchical.

    Foot washing was the job of the lowest household servant, preferably a non-Jewish slave. It was never the host, never a teacher—never a superior.

    Even Jewish servants couldn’t always be required to wash feet since it was considered too degrading. This was the task reserved for those without status, power, or honor.

    Which makes what happened at the Last Supper so striking.

    There was a basin.
    There was water.
    There were towels.

    But there was no servant.


    When No One Would Kneel

    The Gospel of John does not tell us why no one washed the disciples’ feet before the meal. It doesn’t need to. The other Gospels give us the context.

    Luke tells us that during this very meal, the disciples were arguing about which of them was the greatest (Luke 22:24). This was a repeated pattern. Time and again, they jockeyed for position, asked for seats of honor, and measured themselves against one another.

    In their culture, foot washing wasn’t merely unpleasant. It was a public admission of inferiority. If one disciple washed the others’ feet, he would be declaring himself beneath the rest.

    So no one moved.

    And here is the uncomfortable truth we often miss:

    The disciples were not ignorant of humility. They were unwilling to embrace humiliation.

    They were willing to eat with dirty feet rather than kneel beneath one another.


    Why Jesus Let the Meal Begin

    This detail matters.

    According to John 13, Jesus doesn’t immediately intervene. He allows the meal to proceed. They reclined at the table with their dirty feet exposed, close together, and undeniable.

    This was intentional. Watch how Jesus reacted.

    Jesus did not rush to correct the moment. He let it sit. He let the tension breathe. He let their unwillingness become visible.

    Why?

    Because if He had washed their feet before the meal, it could have been misunderstood as a courtesy.

    By waiting, Jesus transformed it into a confrontation.

    They ate while the unspoken problem remained unresolved. They ate knowing someone should have knelt. They ate knowing no one would.

    Only then did Jesus rise.


    The Lord Who Knelt

    John introduces the foot washing with one of the most theologically dense verses in the Gospels:

    “Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under His power, and that He had come from God and was returning to God.”
    (John 13:3)

    This is not incidental.

    John is explicit: Jesus acts from a position of total authority, not insecurity. And then, knowing who He is, Jesus does the unthinkable.

    He:

    • Gets up from the table
    • Takes off His outer garment
    • Wraps a towel around His waist
    • Pours water into a basin
    • Kneels

    Every movement echoes the posture of a slave.

    The One through whom all things were made takes the place no one else would take.


    Peter’s Protest… and Ours

    When Jesus reaches Peter, the tension finally breaks.

    “Lord, are You going to wash my feet?”
    (John 13:6)

    Peter’s objection isn’t pride in the usual sense. It is discomfort. Confusion. Reverence.

    “You shall never wash my feet.”

    Peter recognizes the reversal of order—and it feels wrong.

    But Jesus responds with words that still confront us:

    “Unless I wash you, you have no part with Me.”
    (John 13:8)

    This is not about hygiene. It is about relationship.

    Peter wants a Messiah who reigns. Jesus insists on being a Messiah who serves.

    You cannot follow Christ while rejecting the way He chooses to love. You cannot accept His crown while refusing His towel.


    Why the Dirty Feet Matter

    It is easy to miss how radical this moment truly is.

    Jesus doesn’t merely teach about service. He doesn’t merely recommend humility. He enacts it, physically, personally, unmistakably.

    And He does so after their failure.

    He washes the feet of:

    • The disciples who refused to serve one another
    • The men arguing about greatness
    • The one who would deny Him
    • The one who would betray Him

    Jesus kneels before unrepentant pride.

    That is the scandal.


    Teacher and Lord

    After He finishes, Jesus resumes His place at the table and asks a dangerous question:

    “Do you understand what I have done for you?”
    (John 13:12)

    Then He names the truth plainly:

    “You call Me Teacher and Lord—and rightly so, for that is what I am.”
    (John 13:13)

    Jesus doesn’t deny His authority in order to emphasize humility. He grounds humility in authority. If Jesus were merely an equal, this act would be kind. But because He is Lord, it is revolutionary.


    “As I Have Done for You”

    Jesus’ conclusion isn’t symbolic. It’s ethical.

    “Now that I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash one another’s feet.”
    (John 13:14)

    This isn’t a call to occasional gestures. It’s a redefinition of greatness.

    In the Kingdom of God, rank does not excuse service, knowledge does not exempt obedience, and calling does not cancel humility.

    The closer one is to Christ, the closer one should be to the floor.


    Why This Still Confronts Us

    We live in a culture that praises leadership but resists servanthood. We admire humility as long as it doesn’t cost us dignity. We like the idea of washing feet more than the reality of kneeling.

    But Jesus does not ask us to admire the act. He asks us to imitate it.

    Not ceremonially.
    Not symbolically.
    But relationally.

    Who are the people we believe should kneel for us? Who do we quietly believe are beneath our service? Where do we preserve our status at the expense of love?

    These aren’t abstract questions.

    They’re the basin in front of us.

    When we live by the ladder, we live in isolation. We feel lonely at the bottom because we feel unseen, but we also feel lonely at the top because we are constantly defending a status that doesn’t allow for true connection. That night in the upper room, every disciple chose the ladder, and the room grew heavy under the weight.

    The basin was the only way out.

    It was the only place where status no longer mattered, where comparison ended, where love could finally move. The basin is where performance stops, where defenses fall away, and where we allow ourselves to be shaped by something greater than ourselves.


    The Last Lesson Before the Cross

    This moment takes place on the night Jesus is betrayed.

    Before the cross.
    Before the blood.
    Before the crown of thorns.

    Jesus’ final lesson to His disciples isn’t power, strategy, or dominance.

    It’s posture.

    The hands that will soon be pierced first wash feet. The knees that will bear the cross first touch the floor. And in doing so, Jesus shows us what God is like.

    Not distant.
    Not self-protective.
    Not obsessed with rank.

    But willing, always, to take the lowest place so that others might be made clean.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Powered by